Router Comparison (ev1lut10n's router compared to antihackerlink's router)
Router Comparison (antihackerlink's router compared to ev1lut10n's router)
sh-3.1# nmap -A ev1lut10n_router -PN
Starting Nmap 5.51 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2012-03-26 04:34 WIT
Nmap scan report for *****************************
Host is up (0.23s latency).
Not shown: 998 filtered ports
PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION
25/tcp closed smtp
53/tcp closed domain
Device type: router|switch
Running: Cisco IOS 12.X
Too many fingerprints match this host to give specific OS details
Network Distance: 18 hops
and now let's see what our best hax0r's router looks like :
sh-3.1# nmap -A antihackerlink_router -PN
Starting Nmap 5.51 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2012-03-26 04:18 WIT
Nmap scan report for **************************************
Host is up (0.0029s latency).
Not shown: 994 closed ports
PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION
23/tcp open telnet Linux telnetd
179/tcp open tcpwrapped
1723/tcp open pptp MikroTik (Firmware: 1)
2000/tcp open cisco-sccp?
8088/tcp open mikrotik
8291/tcp open unknown
congratz dude with your funny mikrotik router :))
wh3r3 is my p0rt wh3r3 is teh p0rt ? it's uncommon port y0u can't g3t 1t w1th your lame nmap sk1lls
muahahaha try t0 r34d th1s l4m3r:
getting frustated already ??? try to open this (off course if you can scr1pt k1dd13s) :
gopher://sdf.org/0/users/wisdomc0/indonesian_lamers
Home »Unlabelled » Router Comparison (ev1lut10n's router compared to antihackerlink's router)